Small Open Source: Navigating the Future of Critical

Open-source software (OSS) has become the bedrock of modern technology, powering everything from global enterprises to personal devices. While megaprojects like the Linux kernel or Kubernetes often grab headlines, the vast ecosystem relies heavily on countless “small” open-source projects. These projects, often maintained by a handful of dedicated volunteers or even a single individual, form the invisible yet critical infrastructure of our digital world. However, their future is increasingly precarious, facing unique challenges that threaten their very existence. This article explores the vital role of small open source, the significant hurdles it faces, and the strategies necessary to ensure its sustainable future.

Developer working on laptop with open source code visible — Photo by Van Tay Media on Unsplash

The Unsung Pillars: Defining “Small” Open Source

What exactly constitutes “small” open source? Unlike their corporate-backed counterparts with dedicated teams and substantial budgets, these projects are typically characterized by:

Limited Maintainers: Often run by one or two core developers, frequently in their spare time.
Niche Focus: Addressing specific problems or providing specialized functionalities that larger projects might overlook.
Modest Funding: Relying on sporadic donations, personal funds, or no direct financial support at all.
Widespread Dependency: Despite their size, these projects can be critical dependencies for thousands of larger applications and systems. A 2022 Linux Foundation study indicated that 70-90% of any given software codebase is composed of open-source components, many of which are “small” projects.

These projects, while often unseen, are vital for innovation, offering specialized tools and libraries that accelerate development across industries. They democratize access to technology, allowing startups and smaller businesses to build solutions without incurring prohibitive licensing fees.

The Precipice: Challenges Facing Small Open Source

The foundational role of small open-source projects is increasingly at odds with the severe challenges they confront, pushing many to the brink of unsustainability.

Funding and Resources

The most pervasive issue is the chronic lack of financial resources. Many maintainers are “unpaid hobbyists,” with a significant portion indicating they would appreciate being compensated for their work. Without a clear revenue model, projects struggle to cover basic infrastructure costs, invest in necessary tooling, or even compensate developers for their invaluable time and effort. This financial instability directly impacts a project’s ability to maintain quality, improve security, and ensure long-term viability.

Maintainer Burnout and Succession

The burden on individual maintainers is immense. They often juggle coding, bug fixing, documentation, community management, and security patches, frequently without pay and in their limited free time. Studies show that nearly three-quarters (73%) of developers have experienced burnout at some point in their careers, a problem exacerbated for open-source contributors who lack formal support structures. This leads to high rates of maintainers considering or actually quitting their projects, with 60% having done so or considered it. Furthermore, the open-source maintainer community is “graying,” with a notable drop in younger maintainers, posing a significant succession challenge for the future.

Overwhelmed developer with many tasks — Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

Security Vulnerabilities

The “small” nature of these projects often translates to limited resources for proactive security measures. Critical vulnerabilities, such as the infamous Heartbleed bug in OpenSSL or the Log4j vulnerability, highlighted how a single flaw in a widely used, yet under-resourced, open-source component can trigger a global security crisis. Small projects may lack the bandwidth for rigorous code reviews, continuous security scanning, or rapid patch deployment, making them attractive targets for supply chain attacks.

Community Engagement and Documentation

While open source thrives on collaboration, smaller projects can struggle to attract and retain new contributors. Lack of clear documentation, complex onboarding processes, or inconsistent communication can deter potential help. This creates a vicious cycle where overworked maintainers have less time to improve these aspects, further limiting community growth.

Pathways to Resilience: Strategies for Sustainability

Despite these formidable challenges, several strategies and initiatives are emerging to bolster the sustainability of small open-source projects.

Diverse Funding Models

Moving beyond ad-hoc donations is crucial. Projects can explore:

Crowdfunding Platforms: Services like GitHub Sponsors, Patreon, and Open Collective enable direct, recurring financial contributions from users and organizations. GitHub Sponsors alone has raised over $33 million for maintainers, with a significant portion coming from organizations.
Grants and Fellowships: Organizations like the Mozilla Open Source Support Program and the FLOSS/fund offer grants to projects aligning with public good objectives. The GitHub Secure Open Source Fund also provides direct funding and expert guidance to critical projects to improve their security posture.
Corporate Sponsorships and Public-Private Partnerships: Companies that rely on specific open-source tools are increasingly recognizing the value of direct financial or resource-based sponsorships. This can involve funding specific features or dedicating employee time to contribute, fostering a symbiotic relationship.
Open-Core and Paid Services: Some projects adopt an open-core model, offering a free, open-source base with additional features, support, or services available commercially. This allows for monetization while maintaining the core principles of open source.

Community Building and Governance

Sustainable projects cultivate vibrant communities. This involves:

Clear Contribution Guidelines: Making it easy for new contributors to understand how to get involved, even with small tasks like documentation improvements.
Mentorship Programs: Guiding new developers helps distribute workload and builds a succession pipeline.
Establishing Foundations: For projects reaching a certain scale, forming a legal entity or joining an existing foundation (like the Linux Foundation or Apache Software Foundation) can provide governance, legal protection, and administrative support, easing the burden on individual maintainers.

Tooling and Automation

Leveraging automation can significantly reduce the manual effort required for maintenance and security. Implementing robust CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, and code linters helps maintain code quality and frees up maintainers’ time.

Hands collaborating, building a structure — Photo by Hakim Menikh on Unsplash

Securing the Foundations: Small Projects in the Supply Chain

The security of the broader software supply chain is intrinsically linked to the health of its smallest components. A single compromised library can have cascading effects across thousands of downstream projects.

Recognizing this, initiatives like the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) are crucial. The OpenSSF, a cross-industry initiative under the Linux Foundation, aims to secure open-source software for the public good. One of its key contributions is the Open Source Project Security Baseline (OSPS Baseline), which provides a streamlined set of security requirements specifically designed for small teams and maintainers. This framework offers practical guidance on vulnerability management, access control, and branch protection to mitigate supply chain risks.

Furthermore, tools for generating Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) and frameworks like Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) are becoming essential for understanding and managing dependencies, allowing organizations to assess risks associated with the open-source components they consume. By providing better visibility and standardized security practices, these initiatives empower both maintainers and consumers to build a more resilient software ecosystem.

Conclusion

The fate of “small” open source is not merely a niche concern; it is a critical determinant of the entire technology landscape’s stability, innovation, and security. These unsung projects, often born from passion and maintained through dedication, are indispensable. Their challenges—from chronic underfunding and maintainer burnout to security vulnerabilities—demand collective attention and strategic intervention.

By fostering diverse funding models, strengthening community engagement, embracing automation, and supporting security initiatives like OpenSSF, we can build a more robust and sustainable future for these vital projects. The responsibility falls not just on individual developers but on the entire ecosystem: corporations that rely on open source, foundations that champion its values, and users who benefit from its freedom. Investing in small open source is investing in the future of technology itself.

References

DEV Community (2025). Open Source Funding for Small Projects: A Sustainable Path Forward.

Opensource.com (n.d.). 12 challenges for open source projects.

Open Source Guides (2023). 10 Funding Opportunities For Your Open Source Project.

Thompson, C. (2022). Why Open-Source Developers Are Burning Out. Better Programming.

Azalio (2025). Why software developers burn out, and how to fix it.

Holmes, J. H., et al. (2018). Open-source Software Sustainability Models: Initial White Paper From the Informatics Technology for Cancer Research Sustainability and Industry Partnership Working Group. PubMed Central.

Kelly, R. (2024). Burnout is now rife across the software community, with almost half of developers turning to self-help apps. ITPro.

Levanenia, A. (2024). Open-Source Development: Is It Sustainable or Exploitative?. Medium.

DevOps.com (2025). OpenSSF Defines Baseline for Securing Open Source Software.

ICTworks (2024). Apply Now: $1 Million in Grant Funding for Open Source Software.

Sealos Blog (2025). The Ultimate Guide to Funding Open Source Projects.

The Turing Way (n.d.). Sustainability of Open Source Projects.

The New Stack (2023). Open Source Needs Maintainers. But How Can They Get Paid?.

Milvus (n.d.). What are the challenges of scaling open-source projects?.

Levanenia, A. (2024). Open-Source Development: Is It Sustainable or Exploitative?. Medium.

SD Times (2024). The state of open source maintainers.

Nayafia/lemonade-stand (n.d.). A handy guide to financial support for open source. GitHub.

Abubakar, P. (2023). How to Overcome the Challenges of Open Source Contribution. Medium.

The Stack Overflow Blog (2020). Avoiding burnout as an ambitious developer.

Tidelift (2024). The open source maintainer community is getting grayer.

Impressico (2023). How Open Source Software Can be Beneficial for Businesses.

Brinker, A. L. (2025). Open Source Software and Corporate Influence.

Carattino, A. (2020). Common problems with open source projects.

OpenSSF (n.d.). Projects.

GitHub (2025). Securing the supply chain at scale: Starting with 71 important open source projects.

OpenSSF (n.d.). Software Supply Chain.

GitHub (n.d.). The Open Source Sustainability Ecosystem.

This collective commitment is essential to safeguarding the invisible infrastructure that underpins our digital world, ensuring its continued innovation and resilience for generations to come.