What is Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus and how do

Cybersecurity resilience is paramount in today’s interconnected digital landscape. As technical professionals, we understand that robust security isn’t just about advanced threat detection; it begins with fundamental, verifiable controls. The UK government-backed Cyber Essentials scheme provides a practical framework for organizations to demonstrate a foundational level of cyber hygiene. This article will deconstruct Cyber Essentials and its enhanced counterpart, Cyber Essentials Plus, providing technical insights into their requirements, implementation, and the certification process.

Understanding Cyber Essentials: The Foundational Controls

Cyber Essentials is a government-backed certification scheme designed to help organizations protect themselves against a wide range of common cyber threats. It focuses on five critical technical controls that, when implemented correctly, can prevent approximately 80% of commodity cyberattacks[1]. For software engineers and system architects, these controls translate directly into tangible configuration and architectural decisions.

The five core controls are:

  1. Firewalls:

    • Technical Rationale: Firewalls act as network traffic filters, defining ingress and egress rules to restrict unauthorized access. This control mandates their proper configuration at network perimeter and host levels.
    • Implementation Details: This involves ensuring all internet-facing connections are protected by a suitably configured firewall. For cloud deployments, this translates to Security Groups (AWS), Network Security Groups (Azure), or VPC Firewall Rules (GCP). On host systems, iptables (Linux), Windows Defender Firewall, or equivalent host-based firewalls must be active and correctly configured to permit only essential services. The principle of least privilege must be applied, allowing only necessary ports and protocols.
    • Example:
      # Example iptables rules for a web server
      sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -s YOUR_ADMIN_IP/32 -j ACCEPT # SSH from specific IP
      sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT # HTTP
      sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT # HTTPS
      sudo iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
      sudo iptables -P INPUT DROP # Drop all other incoming traffic
      sudo iptables -P FORWARD DROP
      sudo iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
      
  2. Secure Configuration:

    • Technical Rationale: Default configurations are often insecure, leaving systems vulnerable. This control requires hardening operating systems, applications, and network devices.
    • Implementation Details: This is where Infrastructure as Code (IaC) becomes invaluable. Tools like Ansible, Terraform, or Puppet can enforce baseline configurations derived from industry standards such as CIS Benchmarks[2]. Key aspects include:
      • Disabling unnecessary services and ports.
      • Removing default or unneeded user accounts.
      • Enforcing strong password policies and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for administrative access.
      • Automating configuration drift detection and remediation.
    • Trade-offs: Over-hardening can impact application compatibility or performance. A balanced approach, often guided by risk assessment, is crucial.
  3. User Access Control:

    • Technical Rationale: Managing who has access to what, and under what conditions, is fundamental to preventing unauthorized data access or system manipulation.
    • Implementation Details: This mandates a least privilege model. Access should be granted based on job role and revoked promptly when no longer needed.
      • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) systems (e.g., IAM policies in AWS/Azure, Kubernetes RBAC) are critical.
      • Centralized identity providers (IdPs) like Azure AD, Okta, or Keycloak should manage user authentication and authorization.
      • Segregation of duties, especially for administrative accounts, is a key principle.
      • Regular access reviews are essential to prevent privilege creep.
  4. Malware Protection:

    • Technical Rationale: Protecting systems from malicious software is a core defense.
    • Implementation Details: This requires deploying and maintaining anti-malware solutions on all relevant devices (servers, workstations).
      • Solutions like Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems (e.g., CrowdStrike, SentinelOne) provide advanced threat protection beyond traditional antivirus.
      • Signature-based and heuristic scanning must be enabled and kept up-to-date.
      • Email and web content filtering, potentially leveraging secure gateways or DNS filtering, complements endpoint protection by blocking threats at the perimeter.
      • Regular security awareness training for users is a non-technical but crucial component.
  5. Patch Management:

    • Technical Rationale: Unpatched software vulnerabilities are a primary attack vector. This control ensures systems are kept up-to-date.
    • Implementation Details: A robust patch management strategy involves:
      • Automated vulnerability scanning (e.g., Nessus, OpenVAS, Trivy in CI/CD pipelines) to identify missing patches.
      • A defined patching schedule and process for operating systems, applications, and firmware.
      • Utilizing patch management systems (e.g., WSUS, SCCM, Satellite, or cloud-native solutions like AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager).
      • Testing patches in a staging environment before widespread deployment to mitigate regressions.
    • Deployment Pipeline Integration:
      graph TD
          A[New Vulnerability/Patch Released] --> B{Vulnerability Scan};
          B --> C{Identify Affected Systems};
          C --> D[Develop Patch Strategy];
          D --> E[Test in Staging Environment];
          E -- Success --> F[Deploy to Production];
          E -- Failure --> D;
          F --> G[Verify Patch Application];
      

Note: Cyber Essentials focuses on preventative controls. While logging and monitoring are crucial for detecting and responding to incidents, they are not explicitly part of the five core Cyber Essentials controls, though they are implicitly supported by good secure configuration and patch management practices.

Stepping Up to Cyber Essentials Plus: Technical Verification

While Cyber Essentials relies on a self-assessment questionnaire, Cyber Essentials Plus (CE+) takes it a significant step further. It involves an independent technical audit of your systems by a certified assessor. This provides a higher level of assurance, as your claims are empirically verified.

The CE+ audit encompasses:

  • External Vulnerability Scan: An automated scan of your public-facing IP addresses and domains to identify known vulnerabilities. This is often performed by the assessor from an external network.
  • Internal Vulnerability Scan: An internal scan of a representative sample of workstations, servers, and network devices to ensure secure configurations and patch levels. This scan typically checks for missing security updates, insecure configurations, and common vulnerabilities.
  • Configuration Checks: Direct verification of specific configurations on sample devices, ensuring firewalls are active, malware protection is running and up-to-date, and strong access controls are in place. This includes inspecting registry settings, service configurations, and installed software lists.
  • Malware Protection Testing: Assessor attempts to introduce benign test files (e.g., EICAR test file) to verify that your anti-malware solution detects and blocks them effectively.
  • Web Browser Security Test: Checks browser configurations on sample workstations for secure settings, such as blocking pop-ups, enabling safe browsing features, and ensuring up-to-date browser versions.

Comparison of Cyber Essentials vs. Cyber Essentials Plus

FeatureCyber Essentials (CE)Cyber Essentials Plus (CE+)
Assessment MethodSelf-assessment questionnaireIndependent technical audit + External/Internal scans
Assurance LevelBasic, self-attestedHigher, independently verified
CostLower (self-assessment fee)Higher (assessor fees, potentially remediation costs)
Technical VerificationNone (relies on honesty and accuracy of answers)Yes, hands-on testing by a qualified assessor
ScopeOrganization-wide (as per self-assessment)Representative sample of systems, public-facing infrastructure
Primary GoalEstablish foundational controls, self-awarenessProve efficacy of controls, identify practical weaknesses

Diagram illustrating the difference between self-assessment (CE) and technical audit (CE+)
Conceptual diagram showing CE as a questionnaire submission and CE+ as a more involved technical verification process with an assessor

The Certification Journey: From Preparation to Accreditation

Achieving Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus certification involves a structured process.

  1. Scope Definition:

    • Clearly define the organizational scope to be certified. This is crucial as all in-scope systems must meet the requirements.
    • Consider specific networks, departments, or even cloud environments.
    • Technical Consideration: If your organization uses complex multi-cloud or hybrid architectures, ensure all relevant components within the defined scope are covered.
  2. Gap Analysis and Remediation:

    • For CE: Review the five controls against your current technical posture. Identify gaps and implement necessary changes.
    • For CE+: A pre-assessment by a Certification Body (CB) is highly recommended. This might include a preliminary vulnerability scan or a review of your documentation to catch issues before the formal audit.
    • Practical Example: Use automated tools (e.g., OSSTMM, Nmap, OpenVAS) to perform internal scans and identify missing patches or insecure configurations. Script compliance checks using PowerShell or Bash.
  3. Choosing a Certification Body (CB):

    • Both CE and CE+ must be assessed by an NCSC-accredited Certification Body. These bodies provide the self-assessment portal for CE and conduct the technical audits for CE+.
  4. The Assessment:

    • For CE: You complete an online questionnaire, attesting that your organization meets the requirements for each of the five controls. This typically involves answering technical questions about your firewall configurations, patching policies, and access controls.
    • For CE+: A CB assessor will schedule the technical audit. This usually involves:
      • Remote Access: The assessor may require temporary access to a sample of your systems (e.g., via a secure VPN or remote desktop) to perform internal scans and configuration checks.
      • Collaboration: Be prepared to provide evidence (screenshots, configuration files, policy documents) and answer detailed technical questions during the audit.
      • Penetration Testing (Light): While not a full-scale penetration test, the CE+ audit does include elements like the EICAR file test and external vulnerability scanning, which are precursors to more comprehensive security assessments.
  5. Certification and Remediation:

    • If successful, you receive your Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus certificate.
    • If findings are raised, you will typically have a grace period (e.g., 2-4 weeks) to remediate the issues and undergo re-assessment for the failed areas.

Important Note: Certification is valid for 12 months. Continuous adherence to the controls and regular re-assessment are vital for maintaining a strong security posture.

Advanced Implementation Strategies and Continuous Compliance

For technical teams, achieving and maintaining Cyber Essentials certifications isn’t a one-time event; it’s an ongoing commitment to continuous security improvement.

  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for Compliance:
    • Define your firewall rules, secure configurations, and access controls in code (e.g., Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible playbooks). This ensures consistency, repeatability, and makes auditing easier.
    • Example (Terraform for AWS Security Group):
      resource "aws_security_group" "web_server_sg" {
        name        = "web_server_security_group"
        description = "Allow HTTP/S and SSH access"
        vpc_id      = aws_vpc.main.id
      
        ingress {
          description      = "Allow HTTP from internet"
          from_port        = 80
          to_port          = 80
          protocol         = "tcp"
          cidr_blocks      = ["0.0.0.0/0"]
          ipv6_cidr_blocks = ["::/0"]
        }
      
        ingress {
          description      = "Allow HTTPS from internet"
          from_port        = 443
          to_port          = 443
          protocol         = "tcp"
          cidr_blocks      = ["0.0.0.0/0"]
          ipv6_cidr_blocks = ["::/0"]
        }
      
        ingress {
          description      = "Allow SSH from admin IP"
          from_port        = 22
          to_port          = 22
          protocol         = "tcp"
          cidr_blocks      = ["${var.admin_ip}/32"] # Restrict SSH to specific IP
        }
      
        egress {
          from_port        = 0
          to_port          = 0
          protocol         = "-1"
          cidr_blocks      = ["0.0.0.0/0"]
          ipv6_cidr_blocks = ["::/0"]
        }
      
        tags = {
          Name = "web_server_sg"
        }
      }
      
  • DevSecOps Integration:
    • Embed security checks directly into your CI/CD pipelines.
    • Automate vulnerability scanning of container images and application code (SAST/DAST).
    • Enforce secure coding practices and dependency management.
  • Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM):
    • Utilize tools like AWS Security Hub, Azure Security Center, or third-party CSPM solutions (e.g., Orca Security, Wiz) to continuously monitor cloud resources for compliance with Cyber Essentials controls. These tools can identify misconfigured S3 buckets, insecure IAM policies, or unpatched virtual machines.
  • Centralized Logging and Monitoring:
    • While not a direct CE control, robust logging and a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system are critical for detecting deviations from secure configurations, failed access attempts, and malware activity, which indirectly supports the CE controls.

Conclusion

Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus provide a pragmatic and effective framework for establishing and verifying fundamental cybersecurity controls. For technical professionals, they represent a clear set of requirements that translate directly into architectural decisions, system configurations, and operational processes. By embracing IaC, DevSecOps principles, and continuous monitoring, organizations can not only achieve these certifications but also build a resilient and defensible digital infrastructure. The commitment to these basic controls is the bedrock upon which more advanced security strategies can be effectively built, safeguarding your systems and data against the ever-evolving threat landscape.


References

[1] National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). (2023). Cyber Essentials: The scheme overview. Available at: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberessentials/overview (Accessed: November 2025) [2] Center for Internet Security (CIS). (2023). CIS Benchmarks. Available at: https://www.cisecurity.org/cis-benchmarks/ (Accessed: November 2025) [3] UK Government. (2023). Cyber Essentials requirements for IT infrastructure. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cyber-essentials-requirements-for-it-infrastructure (Accessed: November 2025) [4] CREST. (2023). Cyber Essentials Plus Technical Requirements. Available at: https://www.crest-approved.org/schemes/cyber-essentials/cyber-essentials-plus-technical-requirements/ (Accessed: November 2025)

Thank you for reading! If you have any feedback or comments, please send them to [email protected].